feat: add git state check on startup#20
Conversation
Show a heads-up warning when the user is on a non-main branch or when local main/master is behind the remote, so they notice before starting a loop session.
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the user experience by introducing proactive Git state checks at application startup, providing warnings if the user is not on a main branch or if their local main/master branch is behind the remote. Additionally, it improves the clarity of the review process by directing reviewers to concentrate on unstaged changes, and updates documentation consistency. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a helpful feature to warn users about their git repository state on startup, specifically if they are on a non-main branch or their main branch is behind the remote. The implementation is solid, with good use of dependency injection and comprehensive unit tests for the new logic. The changes to prompts and documentation are also clear. I have one suggestion to improve the structure of the new tests for better readability and maintainability.
Summary
git diff) rather than inspecting all changed filesTest plan
checkGitStatecovering all branches (non-main, behind remote, up to date, no git, no upstream)checkGitStatebun run checkpasses